PlanetNikon Forum: Photoshelter accepted my images I was very surprised - PlanetNikon Forum

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Photoshelter accepted my images I was very surprised Thanks DD for the hints and help over the year

#1 User is offline   james23p Icon

  • Deep Space Master Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • View gallery
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 5426
  • Joined: 09-May 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Memphis TN
  • Interests:I am an avid film user and new digital user. I enjoy both formats and firmly believe they can live side by side

Posted 18 April 2008 - 03:57 PM

When I read DD's post on PN's stock agency closing I figured I would just give up. But I saw DD recommend Photoshelter so I said what the heck. Well they accepted 2 of my photos outright and one soft rejection due to administrative issues that I have corrected. So now I am going to look over some of my photos give them a closer look and submit a few more. I will never equal all the big time stock photographers but it is nice to have someone say hey this is not to bad we would be glad to host your image.



Last I want to thank DD again he has really helped me with this.



Jim






God bless all those in harms way and Go Navy! Jim
D40/50/70/80 Moderator

My Stuff:
D700 w/MB-D10, D200, D50, F100 w MB-15, FM3a, FE2(Black and Silver) and EM

Nikon Series E lens, 28mm, 100mm, 135mm, 75-150mm, Nikkor's 35 f2 Ai, 50 f2 Ai, 500 f4 Ai-P, 70-300G ED AF-S VR, 28-105 3.5-4.5 AF-D, 50 1.8 AF-D,
Nikkor 24-120 f3.5-5.6G AF-S ED VR, Nikkor 18-35 f3.5-4.5 AF-D ED

Tamron's SP 17-50 2.8 LD XR DiII, Tamron's SP 70-200 f2.8 LD Di IF/Macro BIM, Tamron's SP 11-18 4.5-5.6 LD DiII, SP 1.4 AF TC

Manfrotto 055XV with Markins M10 , Manfrotto 681 Monopod with Markins Q3 Emille
0

#2 User is offline   Virgil Icon

  • Planet Master Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 1838
  • Joined: 27-January 06
  • Location:Vienna / Austria

Posted 19 April 2008 - 02:50 AM

Jim - you´re a very good photog so being accepted by a stockagency is just a logical consequence of your constant work. Congrats!
0

#3 User is offline   Mickaisy Icon

  • Planet Hero Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 628
  • Joined: 09-January 10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:long island, NY
  • Interests:wildlife, landscape and macro photography, upright bass, and music.

Posted 01 February 2010 - 10:33 PM

Congratulations! My only question is what in the world is stock photography??? I searched on here and randomly on the internet but nothing anyting specific was found. It seems like it has to do with selling photos to websites maybe? but why call it "stock?"

Thanks!
d5000 DSLR!

18-55mm vr nikkor lens
55-200mm vr nikkor lens
0

#4 User is offline   photojazz Icon

  • Eon Timewave Hero Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • View gallery
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 7573
  • Joined: 24-April 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Stuttgart-Hofen, Germany
  • Interests:Photography, Drumming, Photography, Drumming, More Photography, More Drumming

Posted 02 February 2010 - 05:50 AM

Congrats..soon to be FF Jim. Now I know where I can buy a D700 when the time comes...this is a good start for you and next month, you can get a D3..Posted Image
PhotoJazz - Just Capturing Life
PlanetNikon Member 141

Cameras
Nikon D300,D50, F4E, F5, FE2 (Black & Silver), EM
Fuji S7000
Mamiya RB67 and M645 1000s
Bronica ETRSI

Some Lenses

C&C Is Always Welcome!!
scillafotograf90@yahoo.com
0

#5 User is offline   Dave Whiteley Icon

  • Deep Space Master Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 6183
  • Joined: 15-April 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • Interests:Plant, close-up and macrophotography.

Posted 02 February 2010 - 06:16 AM

Stock photography is just the use of Stock Agencies to sell the use of your photographs for you Mick. Stock because they keep thousands of images in stock from different photographers on all subjects, so instead of a firm having to specially commission a photographer to go out and shoot a specific subject they can look through an online catalogue of a stock agency and select the type of image they want at a far cheaper price than hiring a photographer themselves. These agencies are used by magazines, firms compiling catalogues etc etc. If an agency accepts any pictures from you it puts them in it's catalogue and if they sell you get the money less the agencies cut. However you don't get much per picture so have to rely on selling in significant quantities to make a meaningful sum from your photography. Also I gather they don't usually bother sending you a cheque for photographs sold until it is a reasonable sum worth making a cheque out for. Therefore if you only sell the odd few images you may not get paid for some time.

http://en.wikipedia....ock_photography

Congratulations Jim and I hope your pictures sell well. As always it depends on how good the agency is in selling your work how much you make, not always how good a photographer you are alas. There are so many stock agencies around starting up now and competing for business, but to offset that more and more clients are using agencies rather than commissioning photographers themselves.

Still it never hurts to put your images with them instead of just leaving them unused on the computer, and you may make some money.

Dave Whiteley
Nikon D200
AF-S DX Nikkor 18-70 mm f/3.5-4.5G IF-ED
60mm f/2.8D AF Micro-Nikkor
70mm-180mm AF ED f4.5-f5.6 D Micro-Nikkor
Tamron SP AF200-500MM F/5-6.3 Di LD (IF)
Nikon PB6 belows, Nikon Tubes.
2X Nikon SB600 flash guns
Manfrotto dual flash bracket
0

#6 User is offline   Paul Lan Icon

  • Planet Citizen Member
  • PipPipPip
  • View gallery
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 187
  • Joined: 13-January 10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Mauritius, Indian Ocean

Posted 02 February 2010 - 07:45 AM

Glad for you James, congratulations.
Paul Lan

....................
D70, D70s, D200, D300, D300s
50mm F1.4, 17-55 F2.8, 70-200 VR F2.8
0

#7 User is offline   Paul Lan Icon

  • Planet Citizen Member
  • PipPipPip
  • View gallery
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 187
  • Joined: 13-January 10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Mauritius, Indian Ocean

Posted 02 February 2010 - 07:46 AM

Should say Jim instead of James !!!
Paul Lan

....................
D70, D70s, D200, D300, D300s
50mm F1.4, 17-55 F2.8, 70-200 VR F2.8
0

#8 User is offline   photojazz Icon

  • Eon Timewave Hero Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • View gallery
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 7573
  • Joined: 24-April 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Stuttgart-Hofen, Germany
  • Interests:Photography, Drumming, Photography, Drumming, More Photography, More Drumming

Posted 02 February 2010 - 10:02 AM

View PostPaul Lan, on 02 February 2010 - 01:46 PM, said:

Should say Jim instead of James !!!



Paul...but in another 24 hours, he will be getting the D700 and then we can call him FF Jim....Posted Image Posted Image

Right Jim??????Posted Image
PhotoJazz - Just Capturing Life
PlanetNikon Member 141

Cameras
Nikon D300,D50, F4E, F5, FE2 (Black & Silver), EM
Fuji S7000
Mamiya RB67 and M645 1000s
Bronica ETRSI

Some Lenses

C&C Is Always Welcome!!
scillafotograf90@yahoo.com
0

#9 User is offline   Mickaisy Icon

  • Planet Hero Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 628
  • Joined: 09-January 10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:long island, NY
  • Interests:wildlife, landscape and macro photography, upright bass, and music.

Posted 02 February 2010 - 11:09 AM

View PostDave Whiteley, on 02 February 2010 - 06:16 AM, said:

Stock photography is just the use of Stock Agencies to sell the use of your photographs for you Mick. Stock because they keep thousands of images in stock from different photographers on all subjects, so instead of a firm having to specially commission a photographer to go out and shoot a specific subject they can look through an online catalogue of a stock agency and select the type of image they want at a far cheaper price than hiring a photographer themselves. These agencies are used by magazines, firms compiling catalogues etc etc. If an agency accepts any pictures from you it puts them in it's catalogue and if they sell you get the money less the agencies cut. However you don't get much per picture so have to rely on selling in significant quantities to make a meaningful sum from your photography. Also I gather they don't usually bother sending you a cheque for photographs sold until it is a reasonable sum worth making a cheque out for. Therefore if you only sell the odd few images you may not get paid for some time.

http://en.wikipedia....ock_photography

Congratulations Jim and I hope your pictures sell well. As always it depends on how good the agency is in selling your work how much you make, not always how good a photographer you are alas. There are so many stock agencies around starting up now and competing for business, but to offset that more and more clients are using agencies rather than commissioning photographers themselves.

Still it never hurts to put your images with them instead of just leaving them unused on the computer, and you may make some money.

Dave Whiteley


Thanks for the great info Dave!:)
d5000 DSLR!

18-55mm vr nikkor lens
55-200mm vr nikkor lens
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users